Friday, November 14, 2008
Tuesday, November 11, 2008
Good Questions
I've been asked a few follow-up questions relative to my recently published political post. They are fair and should be addressed. Again, I claim no real authority of proof of competence on any economic or legal matters. These are simply my thoughts as a (what I consider) sensible person. (I apologize in advance if this post seems choppy or grammatically imperfect...I've written bits here and there as I've had time)
On The Economy
Mortgage Crisis
I stated earlier that part of the solution to our current economic situation is to let people suffer. I did not mean to imply that it is needful to have our entire economic system collapse. With regards to the 'mortgage crisis', I think we would all agree that it is not in the best interest of our country for hundreds of thousands of people to lose their homes. The most recent reports show that 18% of American homeowners are currently upside-down on their mortgages. If house prices fall another 5%, a full quarter will be upside-down.
Many of these people probably are victims to some degree of deceiving loan agents, a fact which can't be ignored. I believe that to ensure the long-term stability of our markets there (unfortunately) needed to be government intercession. However, I do not believe in doing away with debt (going back to the principle of accountability). I am not an economist, but it seems that there has to be a way that the government could help people refinance their mortgages and help them get on a payment plan which is affordable without giving any handouts or doing away with responsibility.
It is tough for and I sympathize with all of those who are having a hard time making ends meet. I wish I were more educated on the subject. It is ironic, however, that in an age where people are seemingly constantly screaming 'equality now!' and 'we just want what's fair!' that we're trying so hard to have the people who have managed their money well and not fallen for the pitfalls of adjustable-rate mortgages and not taken as many risks to pay the price for those who did not.
Auto Industry
What if I told you that I knew a company which had a 30-year-old reputation of bad quality and craftsmanship, poor leadership, and overpriced goods was about to go out of business? You'd probably say 'It's about time.' It's not so simple, however, when that company happens to employ around 4.15 million people. To put that number in perspective, that is roughly 12.5% of total population of Canada.
The Detroit auto industry simply cannot fail. However, someone has to play the father figure and let them suffer it out for a while and actually make substantial change - a role which I'm glad the federal government seems to be playing so far. Reports released yesterday indicate that the auto industry is burning through cash at a rate much higher than expected, and will possibly be out by mid 2009, if not earlier.
It has been said that necessity is the mother of creativity. It unfortunately takes time to develop a reputation of quality. It unfortunately takes time to switch production lines to make vehicles that people want. My bet is that if the government keeps denying their pleas, and if they keep burning through cash at their current rate, we'll see some very creative ideas in the near future. I would hope that the government would be willing to step in and help right as Detroit is on the verge of collapse, but after it has committed to serious changes in quality and direction. That's how I believe you help anyone in life in almost any situation...you let them figure it out - suffer it out on their own for a while, really push them, and then once they really have done all that they can, help them out.
I could go on about how the auto workers' unions are killing Detroit as well, but we'll save that for another day. That will be under the heading of 'The American Entitlement', or maybe more specifically 'How the American Entitlement is Killing the American Dream'.
On Civil Unions
Through my research, I have found three main differences between marriage and civil unions:
1) Taxes - There are significant differences between how married and civil union couples can file their taxes and how they can otherwise manage their finances jointly. These differences vary greatly from state to state and are easy to look up, so I will not say anymore on them.
2) Portability - If a couple is legally married in one state, that marriage is recognized in every state regardless if they would have been eligible for marriage in every state. Civil unions are only recognized in the state in which it was performed. If a civil union was performed in California and that couple moved to Massachusetts, they would need to have their ceremony performed again.
3) Stigma - The most difficult to define difference but yet arguably most important is that of the cultural significance of the sacred title of marriage. The term 'civil union' just doesn't carry the same emotional and cultural weight as does the title of 'marriage'.
As far as I understand them, I am for civil unions. Honestly I won't be surprised if numbers one and two on my list are eliminated in the near future, especially considering the personal convictions of our new president and how hot of a topic this has become recently. I'm ok with that, based on what I know.
I know this is offensive to many, but I believe that the act of homosexuality is a choice. It's not necessarily a choice to be attracted to someone of the same sex, but it's not a choice for a man to be attracted to women other than his own wife or for people do develop anger management problems either. To me, this is where morality hits reality. I sympathize with the many who are protesting the proposition 8 verdict; not with their cause but with their pain. However, for reasons that none of us can probably fully comprehend at this point, keeping marriage as defined by the unity of one man and one woman is what I believe to be best for the welfare of our country.
------
As a side note, everyone with interest should read up on the history and circumstances regarding Jefferson's letter containing the famous 'Separation of church and state' ideology. Just to get you started, it was written by him to the Danbury Baptists (Conn.) shortly after his election. Also make sure to read Justice Hugo Black's landmark 1947 Supreme Court ruling in Everson v. Board of Education. If you really want to be ambitious, just read the letter and the circumstances surrounding it and then read up on that court decision...don't read any commentary. Then make a decision for yourself on how everything should be interpreted. The pundits on both sides of the issue are extreme and overbearing!
On The Economy
Mortgage Crisis
I stated earlier that part of the solution to our current economic situation is to let people suffer. I did not mean to imply that it is needful to have our entire economic system collapse. With regards to the 'mortgage crisis', I think we would all agree that it is not in the best interest of our country for hundreds of thousands of people to lose their homes. The most recent reports show that 18% of American homeowners are currently upside-down on their mortgages. If house prices fall another 5%, a full quarter will be upside-down.
Many of these people probably are victims to some degree of deceiving loan agents, a fact which can't be ignored. I believe that to ensure the long-term stability of our markets there (unfortunately) needed to be government intercession. However, I do not believe in doing away with debt (going back to the principle of accountability). I am not an economist, but it seems that there has to be a way that the government could help people refinance their mortgages and help them get on a payment plan which is affordable without giving any handouts or doing away with responsibility.
It is tough for and I sympathize with all of those who are having a hard time making ends meet. I wish I were more educated on the subject. It is ironic, however, that in an age where people are seemingly constantly screaming 'equality now!' and 'we just want what's fair!' that we're trying so hard to have the people who have managed their money well and not fallen for the pitfalls of adjustable-rate mortgages and not taken as many risks to pay the price for those who did not.
Auto Industry
What if I told you that I knew a company which had a 30-year-old reputation of bad quality and craftsmanship, poor leadership, and overpriced goods was about to go out of business? You'd probably say 'It's about time.' It's not so simple, however, when that company happens to employ around 4.15 million people. To put that number in perspective, that is roughly 12.5% of total population of Canada.
The Detroit auto industry simply cannot fail. However, someone has to play the father figure and let them suffer it out for a while and actually make substantial change - a role which I'm glad the federal government seems to be playing so far. Reports released yesterday indicate that the auto industry is burning through cash at a rate much higher than expected, and will possibly be out by mid 2009, if not earlier.
It has been said that necessity is the mother of creativity. It unfortunately takes time to develop a reputation of quality. It unfortunately takes time to switch production lines to make vehicles that people want. My bet is that if the government keeps denying their pleas, and if they keep burning through cash at their current rate, we'll see some very creative ideas in the near future. I would hope that the government would be willing to step in and help right as Detroit is on the verge of collapse, but after it has committed to serious changes in quality and direction. That's how I believe you help anyone in life in almost any situation...you let them figure it out - suffer it out on their own for a while, really push them, and then once they really have done all that they can, help them out.
I could go on about how the auto workers' unions are killing Detroit as well, but we'll save that for another day. That will be under the heading of 'The American Entitlement', or maybe more specifically 'How the American Entitlement is Killing the American Dream'.
On Civil Unions
Through my research, I have found three main differences between marriage and civil unions:
1) Taxes - There are significant differences between how married and civil union couples can file their taxes and how they can otherwise manage their finances jointly. These differences vary greatly from state to state and are easy to look up, so I will not say anymore on them.
2) Portability - If a couple is legally married in one state, that marriage is recognized in every state regardless if they would have been eligible for marriage in every state. Civil unions are only recognized in the state in which it was performed. If a civil union was performed in California and that couple moved to Massachusetts, they would need to have their ceremony performed again.
3) Stigma - The most difficult to define difference but yet arguably most important is that of the cultural significance of the sacred title of marriage. The term 'civil union' just doesn't carry the same emotional and cultural weight as does the title of 'marriage'.
As far as I understand them, I am for civil unions. Honestly I won't be surprised if numbers one and two on my list are eliminated in the near future, especially considering the personal convictions of our new president and how hot of a topic this has become recently. I'm ok with that, based on what I know.
I know this is offensive to many, but I believe that the act of homosexuality is a choice. It's not necessarily a choice to be attracted to someone of the same sex, but it's not a choice for a man to be attracted to women other than his own wife or for people do develop anger management problems either. To me, this is where morality hits reality. I sympathize with the many who are protesting the proposition 8 verdict; not with their cause but with their pain. However, for reasons that none of us can probably fully comprehend at this point, keeping marriage as defined by the unity of one man and one woman is what I believe to be best for the welfare of our country.
------
As a side note, everyone with interest should read up on the history and circumstances regarding Jefferson's letter containing the famous 'Separation of church and state' ideology. Just to get you started, it was written by him to the Danbury Baptists (Conn.) shortly after his election. Also make sure to read Justice Hugo Black's landmark 1947 Supreme Court ruling in Everson v. Board of Education. If you really want to be ambitious, just read the letter and the circumstances surrounding it and then read up on that court decision...don't read any commentary. Then make a decision for yourself on how everything should be interpreted. The pundits on both sides of the issue are extreme and overbearing!
Friday, November 7, 2008
Perspective, Politics, and Understanding
I have been wanting to write for quite some time now...I had a 5-part series all laid out in my mind, dissecting the presidential candidates on merits of personality, experience, policy, running mates, etc. Alas I have run out of time for a post like that to be of any relevance and have had other more timely thoughts on my mind.
Presidential Race
Let me start by stating that I voted for McCain. I also was in favor of Proposition 8. I am also a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormon). Many people upon reading that last line would probably say to themselves "Well that figures." I suppose in many circles I'm officially non-progressive, sheltered, bigoted, uninformed, unintelligent, just not willing to see the other side, unable to make rational decisions, a warmonger, brainwashed, a gay-basher, a homophobe, ill-informed on constitutional matters, or any mixture thereof.
You may be surprised to know that I think Rush Linbaugh and Sean Hannity are destructive extremists. You may be surprised to learn that I used to listen to progressive radio every morning before the only local progressive radio station in Rochester went bankrupt. You may be surprised to know that I actually really like Obama. You may be surprised to know that I have read "The Audacity of Hope." I have sought out all of his speeches and have read intently his "Blueprint for America"...and enjoyed it. He is eloquent, charismatic, captivating, intelligent, and he radiates a sincere desire to change the world around him for the better. I think we would all agree that these are great qualities we would desire in any leader.
Someone once said, after leaving the faith of their childhood, "I just don't see how one church can be the right one if so many other people out there feel just as passionately about their faith as I did. I just doesn't make sense." This is a key point. I've come to understand this person's statement much better over the past year as I've sincerely tried to understand why the McCain zealots think that Obama supporters are all left-wing self-absorbed amoral hippies and why Obamaites can't seem to understand why anyone would possibly ever in a million years see anything of worth in McCain.
No matter how passionately you feel about an issue and how well read and informed you are, there is undoubtedly someone on the other side of the table who has read all the same material and knows all the same information and feels just as passionately but in the opposite way. It is easy to be demeaning, belittling, and point fingers at those who don't agree with you. What is difficult, and what I'm coming to realize is the true mark of a 'progressive' or 'liberal' or 'conservative' or good human being, is to look at the person who disagrees with you so passionately and understand where they are coming from and how they can feel the way they do while still believing that they are a rational human being.
With that said, Barack Obama was not my pick but that's ok. Voting is the easy half of the democratic process. Supporting the victor, whomever that may be, is the more important part. I definitely like Obama better as a person than I do McCain. I'd love Barack to be my neighbor. I'd love our kids to hang out together and I'm sure we'd enjoy a barbecue. The positive effects of his charm and charisma are already being felt around the globe only a few days after being elected. His energy has seemingly electrified the country, bringing a sort of magical hope to millions of a better tomorrow...and hope is a powerful and increasingly rare commodity.
Let me tell you why I, a young and well-educated person in New York (3 major qualifications to be a democrat), voted for 'Gramps'. You've got to realize that religion and politics are arguably the two most hotly contested topics in modern conversation simply because neither one can be logically proven through undeniable logical syllogisms. The wild card, of course, in religion is that of personal revelation from a Supreme Being who does know ultimate truth.
We can debate until we're all blue in the face whose economic or healthcare policies will be better for the future of this country, but we will not reach a definitive conclusion. We do not know what the future holds and the fact of the matter is that we're all trying to make educated guesses of what will work best.
I believe that both candidates sincerely believe that their plans will work best for the country. I believe that both candidates want to help this country in the best way possible. Both candidates want the average American to succeed. Obama is as much as a Socialist as McCain is a continuation of Bush. Neither of those statements is factual, but you can see why they would be said if you're willing to look.
I believe that the policies of Obama have a significantly higher risk of irreversible and far-reaching damage. That's not to say that I believe that an Obama presidency would be cataclysmic, I just feel that we have a much greater potential to really hurt ourselves with his policies and with his positions. My reasoning is better left for another post.
I don't think McCain is a white knight who's undying patriotism will save us from all calamity and thrust us into a better world. His policies, especially those dealing with the economy and healthcare, are simply more in line with what I think is actually most beneficial for this country. Call me crazy, but I think our economy is pretty sound. Call me nuts, but I don't think the tax rate is what's currently killing the middle class. We're irresponsible with money - we over spend and we take too many risks, and that example was given to the American people by Uncle Sam himself. The solution for when someone takes a risk and it doesn't pan out categorically is not to bail them out, but to let them suffer in the short term so that they do not make the same mistake again...or at least understand that there are consequences associated with risk and debt. These bailouts and rounds of stimulus checks are, in my opinion, a waste and are setting us up for an apocalyptic disaster in the future. The real problem is that we resist accountability...and we are continuing to do so.
But that's my opinion - maybe I'll be proven right; maybe I'll be proven wrong.
Proposition 8
It is extremely difficult to make laws from a completely objective and amoral viewpoint. I have read works of Immanuel Kant and J.S. Mill, a couple of the more widely recognized great philosophical minds. They spent their lives developing theories of how we should treat each other based only on logical reasoning. The result? A shaky framework of idioms to the effect of "Do that which results in the greatest good." Naturally, this is subject to one's interpretation of the word 'good'.
I have come to the conclusion that there has to be an outside source governing that which is acceptable practice and that which is not. To some, that may be a Supreme Being. To others that may be their own personal beliefs. There simply is no logical way to deem what practices are 'good'.
There seems to be a great disconnect between the gay and lesbian community and their sympathizers and those who support Proposition 8. I really do feel for those who have been fighting for gay 'rights' and feel like this is a major blow to their cause. I understand how unjust this must feel to many. I understand how this can be interpreted to sound as if we (the supporters of prop. 8) don't think of them as people or of the same value as everyone else. It's unfortunate that the idea of 'sexual preference' has been equated with race or gender, though I see why it has.
If a man from Africa or the Middle East has 3 wives (which is legal in many of those areas) and wants to come to America to marry a 4th, of course we would not allow that. If a lonely old lady loves her cat so much that she wants to show her affection by marrying it, she would be laughed out of city hall. Is there anything actually physically or logically wrong with either polygamy or bestiality? Although I don't endorse either, I would say no. But we as a people deem those practices to be immoral or damaging to society in such a way that we feel that they should be outlawed. A man can have a relationship with multiple women, but he may not call it marriage, regardless of how much he loves each woman. A woman can live forever with her dogs, but she cannot use the sacred title of marriage to describe her relationship.
It is not that we feel that this man or this woman are not equals with everybody else or that we feel they should be done some great harm or injustice. We do not hate gays or lesbians. We do not think they should be punnished or mistreated anymore than who has a different opinion than us should be. It is about defining a sacred title. The people have spoken and it seems (with the exclusion of the paper ballots) that they have spoken to make the title of 'marriage' available only to the union of man and woman.
Those on the other side of Prop. 8 like to use terms such as 'inalienable rights' to describe why marriage should apply to them. Someone has to determine what rights are inalienable. We can't turn to the Bible because we don't all believe in it and those who do interpret it so differently. We can't turn to any other universal source for similar reasons. And so we turn to ourselves and we have decided that marriage between man and man is, in fact, not an inalienable right...at least not yet.
The LDS Church and Prop. 8
The bold stance of the Church came as a surprise to many, and rightfully so. Over the years, the Church has time and time again stressed the importance of its members being politically active, but has itself almost always remained politically neutral. It may be difficult to see why the leaders of the Church picked now to become so actively involved in a political process. There is no doubt that the Church went out of its way to motivate its members to consecrate both their time and means to the cause. Just because we don't see or understand why the leaders of the Church have asked us to do something, doesn't mean there isn't a reason.
We believe in the same organization that existed in the primitive church, namely, apostles, prophets, pastors, teachers, evangelists, and so forth. To cite a trite example, just because it wasn't raining at the time Noah was building an arc didn't make him any less of a prophet. I have faith in the Prophet and Apostles of the Church. I have received witnesses far too sacred to share in this media of the nature of their callings. It is my solemn belief that if they say that a cause is important for me to back, and it's important for me to get involved, then I believe them...without seeing the rain.
------------------------------------------------------------
I have purposefully disallowed comments for this post. It is what it is.
------------------------------------------------------------
Presidential Race
Let me start by stating that I voted for McCain. I also was in favor of Proposition 8. I am also a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormon). Many people upon reading that last line would probably say to themselves "Well that figures." I suppose in many circles I'm officially non-progressive, sheltered, bigoted, uninformed, unintelligent, just not willing to see the other side, unable to make rational decisions, a warmonger, brainwashed, a gay-basher, a homophobe, ill-informed on constitutional matters, or any mixture thereof.
You may be surprised to know that I think Rush Linbaugh and Sean Hannity are destructive extremists. You may be surprised to learn that I used to listen to progressive radio every morning before the only local progressive radio station in Rochester went bankrupt. You may be surprised to know that I actually really like Obama. You may be surprised to know that I have read "The Audacity of Hope." I have sought out all of his speeches and have read intently his "Blueprint for America"...and enjoyed it. He is eloquent, charismatic, captivating, intelligent, and he radiates a sincere desire to change the world around him for the better. I think we would all agree that these are great qualities we would desire in any leader.
Someone once said, after leaving the faith of their childhood, "I just don't see how one church can be the right one if so many other people out there feel just as passionately about their faith as I did. I just doesn't make sense." This is a key point. I've come to understand this person's statement much better over the past year as I've sincerely tried to understand why the McCain zealots think that Obama supporters are all left-wing self-absorbed amoral hippies and why Obamaites can't seem to understand why anyone would possibly ever in a million years see anything of worth in McCain.
No matter how passionately you feel about an issue and how well read and informed you are, there is undoubtedly someone on the other side of the table who has read all the same material and knows all the same information and feels just as passionately but in the opposite way. It is easy to be demeaning, belittling, and point fingers at those who don't agree with you. What is difficult, and what I'm coming to realize is the true mark of a 'progressive' or 'liberal' or 'conservative' or good human being, is to look at the person who disagrees with you so passionately and understand where they are coming from and how they can feel the way they do while still believing that they are a rational human being.
With that said, Barack Obama was not my pick but that's ok. Voting is the easy half of the democratic process. Supporting the victor, whomever that may be, is the more important part. I definitely like Obama better as a person than I do McCain. I'd love Barack to be my neighbor. I'd love our kids to hang out together and I'm sure we'd enjoy a barbecue. The positive effects of his charm and charisma are already being felt around the globe only a few days after being elected. His energy has seemingly electrified the country, bringing a sort of magical hope to millions of a better tomorrow...and hope is a powerful and increasingly rare commodity.
Let me tell you why I, a young and well-educated person in New York (3 major qualifications to be a democrat), voted for 'Gramps'. You've got to realize that religion and politics are arguably the two most hotly contested topics in modern conversation simply because neither one can be logically proven through undeniable logical syllogisms. The wild card, of course, in religion is that of personal revelation from a Supreme Being who does know ultimate truth.
We can debate until we're all blue in the face whose economic or healthcare policies will be better for the future of this country, but we will not reach a definitive conclusion. We do not know what the future holds and the fact of the matter is that we're all trying to make educated guesses of what will work best.
I believe that both candidates sincerely believe that their plans will work best for the country. I believe that both candidates want to help this country in the best way possible. Both candidates want the average American to succeed. Obama is as much as a Socialist as McCain is a continuation of Bush. Neither of those statements is factual, but you can see why they would be said if you're willing to look.
I believe that the policies of Obama have a significantly higher risk of irreversible and far-reaching damage. That's not to say that I believe that an Obama presidency would be cataclysmic, I just feel that we have a much greater potential to really hurt ourselves with his policies and with his positions. My reasoning is better left for another post.
I don't think McCain is a white knight who's undying patriotism will save us from all calamity and thrust us into a better world. His policies, especially those dealing with the economy and healthcare, are simply more in line with what I think is actually most beneficial for this country. Call me crazy, but I think our economy is pretty sound. Call me nuts, but I don't think the tax rate is what's currently killing the middle class. We're irresponsible with money - we over spend and we take too many risks, and that example was given to the American people by Uncle Sam himself. The solution for when someone takes a risk and it doesn't pan out categorically is not to bail them out, but to let them suffer in the short term so that they do not make the same mistake again...or at least understand that there are consequences associated with risk and debt. These bailouts and rounds of stimulus checks are, in my opinion, a waste and are setting us up for an apocalyptic disaster in the future. The real problem is that we resist accountability...and we are continuing to do so.
But that's my opinion - maybe I'll be proven right; maybe I'll be proven wrong.
Proposition 8
It is extremely difficult to make laws from a completely objective and amoral viewpoint. I have read works of Immanuel Kant and J.S. Mill, a couple of the more widely recognized great philosophical minds. They spent their lives developing theories of how we should treat each other based only on logical reasoning. The result? A shaky framework of idioms to the effect of "Do that which results in the greatest good." Naturally, this is subject to one's interpretation of the word 'good'.
I have come to the conclusion that there has to be an outside source governing that which is acceptable practice and that which is not. To some, that may be a Supreme Being. To others that may be their own personal beliefs. There simply is no logical way to deem what practices are 'good'.
There seems to be a great disconnect between the gay and lesbian community and their sympathizers and those who support Proposition 8. I really do feel for those who have been fighting for gay 'rights' and feel like this is a major blow to their cause. I understand how unjust this must feel to many. I understand how this can be interpreted to sound as if we (the supporters of prop. 8) don't think of them as people or of the same value as everyone else. It's unfortunate that the idea of 'sexual preference' has been equated with race or gender, though I see why it has.
If a man from Africa or the Middle East has 3 wives (which is legal in many of those areas) and wants to come to America to marry a 4th, of course we would not allow that. If a lonely old lady loves her cat so much that she wants to show her affection by marrying it, she would be laughed out of city hall. Is there anything actually physically or logically wrong with either polygamy or bestiality? Although I don't endorse either, I would say no. But we as a people deem those practices to be immoral or damaging to society in such a way that we feel that they should be outlawed. A man can have a relationship with multiple women, but he may not call it marriage, regardless of how much he loves each woman. A woman can live forever with her dogs, but she cannot use the sacred title of marriage to describe her relationship.
It is not that we feel that this man or this woman are not equals with everybody else or that we feel they should be done some great harm or injustice. We do not hate gays or lesbians. We do not think they should be punnished or mistreated anymore than who has a different opinion than us should be. It is about defining a sacred title. The people have spoken and it seems (with the exclusion of the paper ballots) that they have spoken to make the title of 'marriage' available only to the union of man and woman.
Those on the other side of Prop. 8 like to use terms such as 'inalienable rights' to describe why marriage should apply to them. Someone has to determine what rights are inalienable. We can't turn to the Bible because we don't all believe in it and those who do interpret it so differently. We can't turn to any other universal source for similar reasons. And so we turn to ourselves and we have decided that marriage between man and man is, in fact, not an inalienable right...at least not yet.
The LDS Church and Prop. 8
The bold stance of the Church came as a surprise to many, and rightfully so. Over the years, the Church has time and time again stressed the importance of its members being politically active, but has itself almost always remained politically neutral. It may be difficult to see why the leaders of the Church picked now to become so actively involved in a political process. There is no doubt that the Church went out of its way to motivate its members to consecrate both their time and means to the cause. Just because we don't see or understand why the leaders of the Church have asked us to do something, doesn't mean there isn't a reason.
We believe in the same organization that existed in the primitive church, namely, apostles, prophets, pastors, teachers, evangelists, and so forth. To cite a trite example, just because it wasn't raining at the time Noah was building an arc didn't make him any less of a prophet. I have faith in the Prophet and Apostles of the Church. I have received witnesses far too sacred to share in this media of the nature of their callings. It is my solemn belief that if they say that a cause is important for me to back, and it's important for me to get involved, then I believe them...without seeing the rain.
------------------------------------------------------------
I have purposefully disallowed comments for this post. It is what it is.
------------------------------------------------------------
Sunday, November 2, 2008
My Baby!
Go to the family page for more pics and info.
By the way, yes that is a Phillies World Champions shirt that I am wearing.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
